|
When considering the division of matrimonial assets the family
home usually comes to mind first, it normally being the asset of
highest value. Second to that, in terms of value, is often the value
of future pension benefits, a fact about which increasing numbers
of divorcees are fortunately becoming more aware.
When looking at pension benefits one must consider not only how
they are valued, but also how they can then be treated in the division
of assets. The following will provide an overview, the intention
is to draw attention to the different types of pensions, and hopefully
allow you to determine whether your own circumstances warrant further
enquiries and action.
Types of Pension Arrangements
Pensions can broadly be divided into the following types:
Employer Pensions (sometimes known also as Occupational
Pension Schemes) can take the form of final salary schemes
(where the benefits are related to earnings at retirement and length
of service) or money purchase schemes (where retirement benefits
are linked to a fund value, being dependent on contributions, investment
returns and retirement age). Stakeholder pensions were introduced
in 2001 in an attempt to make pension arrangements more widely available.
Private pensions exist for self employed individuals or
those, for example, whose employer does not have an existing scheme
or for which they are ineligible to join. The fund value which provides
the pension on retirement will depend on the contributions made
and the return on investment.
State Pension benefits consist of the basic state pension
and SERPS, the latter having the option of "contracting out" and
where funds are invested in private pensions. State benefits belong
to the individual and are not available for earmarking or sharing.
Public Service Schemes include those available to Teachers,
Civil Servants, NHS Staff, the Armed Forces, Police etc. The benefits
available under these scheme are often considerable compared to
the private sector and often include inflation protection and provision
for early retirement. As such establishing current values often
warrants particularly close attention.
What are the options?
When the current value of future pension benefits have been agreed
the following options exist:
Offsetting is where the value of the pension is "traded"
for another capital asset. For example, you have joint ownership
of your home worth £250,000 after repayment of the mortgage, and
your spouse has a personal pension fund of £250,000. If offsetting
is agreed, you might agree to keep the home and your spouse keeps
their pension.
Earmarking is where an agreed percentage of the pension
is identified as yours, and ring-fenced for your benefit on your
spouse's retirement. This should not be the option of choice in
most circumstances because it does not allow for a clean break.
In addition, the pension dies with your spouse, or your spouse could
elect to defer taking this particular pension until the age of 75,
an action that is beyond your control.
Pension sharing was introduced in 2000 for all types of
pension except the basic state pension, which will only ever be
owned by the individual concerned. Pension sharing provides for
the immediate division of the pension into two separate pots, each
individually owned, thereby removing the dependency and association
applicable to the earmarking arrangement.
Valuing Pension Benefits
The options available include the following:
CETV (Cash Equivalent Transfer Value) is a value produced
by the Scheme Administrator/Pension Provider and represents the
value of the member's benefits assuming they are leaving pensionable
service at that time. Whilst this may be appropriate for a money
purchase scheme, for more complex arrangements it does not take
into account such additional benefits as death in service payments,
spouses rights and discretionary benefits provided by the Trustees.
In other words the result is not a fully valued CETV.
Other Options are therefore appropriate when one party disputes
the CETV value and feels that other benefits should also be considered,
a pensions audit (see below) can therefore substantially
increase this value. In other words, an adjusted CETV may either
be permitted by the Court or agreed between the two parties.
Pension Audits
In conducting a pensions audit, consideration may for example be
given to the following, thereby affecting the resultant value:
-
Past service reserves, or assumptions built in to accommodate
promotions and/or inflation
-
Surpluses (or under funding) existing in final salary schemes
-
Fund value approaches assuming the scheme is wound up
As you would expect, earmarking or sharing will require a detailed
understanding of the schemes and how best the assets may be utilised
under each available method. Possible future discretionary increases,
the solvency of schemes, tax considerations relating to income versus
lump sums are all factors that should be considered when looking
at the valuation of future benefits. A pensions audit could substantially
increase a CETV.
What next?
The above represents a very brief overview of what is an extremely
complex subject. In summary, as the value of future pension benefits
is often considerable, special care needs to be taken to satisfy
oneself that firstly the value provided is appropriate and secondly
that the options then available are considered thoroughly. Given
the complexity, advice from a suitably qualified professional in
this respect should always be taken.
An Independent Financial Adviser
(IFA) would be considered to be an appropriate professional, possibly
also involving an Actuary depending on the schemes involved. The
Financial Services Authority Rules and Guidance require the
IFA to have a G60 pensions qualification and an IFA should
have professional indemnity insurance cover protecting the client
from financial loss should there be negligence in the valuation
or transfer procedure.
All contents © copyright www.ondivorce.co.uk - site design www.flatearth.co.uk
|